Legal drafting

Format of complaint under section 12 of the consumer protection act, 1986 In the following case the complainant, Kammu, filed a case against Cholamandalam General Insurance Company Limited before the President District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum under Section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act 1986. The complainant owned a TATA SUMO vehicle insured with the respondent, and after an accident, the complainant informed the respondent and requested their surveyor, but they did not visit the spot. The vehicle was repaired at different workshops, and the complainant spent around Rs. 100,000. The complainant submitted the claim form with all the bills and documents as directed, but the respondent did not make the payment of the amount of damages, causing the complainant mental agony and harassment. The complainant claimed a compensation amount of Rs.50,000/- from the respondent. The respondent neither gave any reply nor made the payment of the damaged vehicle and compensation to the com

IN THE HON’BLE COURT OF ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE, SENIOR DIVISION, _______ Smt. _______wife of _______, age about ____years, resident of village _______, Tehsil ______, Distt. _______, Haryana.                                                                                                                                                                             ……Petitioner Versus 1-    Smt. _________________________  2-    Smt. ________________________ 3-    Smt.  ________________________ 4-    Smt.  ________________________ 5-    Returning Officer, Panchayat/SDM, __________, District_________, Haryana. 6-    Deputy Commissioner/Distt. Election Officer Panchayat village ________, Tehsil _________, Distt. _______ 7-    Block Development & Panchayat Officer,  Tehsil _________, Distt. ________. ……………Respondents Election Petition under section 176 (b) of the Haryana Panchayati Raj Act 1994 . Respected Sir,                       The petitioner most humbly submi

Here is the actual format of a petition UNDER SECTION  25 OF THE GUARDIAN AND WARDS ACT 1890 FOR THE CUSTODY OF MINOR children to a father .  IN THE COURT   OF HON’BLE CIVIL JUDGE (SR. DIVN.)……….. Vijay Kumar son of Shri Narayan Singh, R/o  ..                                                                                           ……..Petitioner                                                    VERSUS Mrs. Pooja, wife of Shri   Vijay Kumar,   D/o Shri Karan Singh.                                                                                                 …Respondent PETITION   UNDER SECTION   25 OF THE GUARDIAN AND WARDS ACT 1890 FOR THE CUSTODY OF MINOR DEEPAK AGED ABOUT 12 YEARS AND DAUGHTER NAMELY HIMANSHI AGED ABOUT 7 YEARS TO THE PETITIONER –FATHER   MOST RESPECTFULLY  SHOWETH : 1-             That the marriage of the petitioner was performed/ solemnized with the respondent on 8 th August, 2002 at …… according to Hindu rites and ceremony in presence of friends