Advertisement

written statement in domestic violence act suit | reply of dv act | Ws 125 Crpc

Written statement in domestic violence act suit | reply of dv act | Ws 125 Crpc | 

            In the Hon’ble court of Illaqua Magistrate _____________

                   Smt. ________              Vs.         Sh. ________

Petition under section 12,18,19,20,21 & 22  of D.V Act.

Reply to the petition on behalf of the respondents.

R/Madam,

          The answering respondents respectfully submits as under :-

Preliminary objections :

1.   That the present petition of the petitioner is not maintainable against the answering respondents because petitioner no. 1 did not want to join the conjugal company of the respondent no. 1 without any sufficicent reason and rhyme and the petitioner no. 1 herself left the house of the respondents and has falsely implicated the answering respondents no. 1 to 5 in the present litigation.  

2.      That the petitioner no. 1 has not come to this Hon’ble court with clean hands and she has suppressed the true and material facts from the Hon’ble court  and as such the present petition of the petitioners is liable to be dismissed.

3.       That the petitioner no. 1 has filed the present petition with malafide intention and with the sole motive to harass the answering respondents as the present petition is based on false and fabricated facts and as such the petition is liable to be dismissed on this ground also.

4.        That the petitioner has got no cause of action to file the present petition against the answering respondents.

5.        That the petitioner has got no locus standi to file the present petition against the answering respondents.

6.        That the petitioner is estopped from filing the present petition by her own act and conduct.

7.        That the facts and circumstances stated in this petition by the petitioner are totally wrong, illegal, false, fabricated, vexatious one and hence the petition is liable to be dismissed with costs.

8.    That the petitioner has suppressed the actual and material facts before this Hon’ble court as the petitioner herself left the house of the respondents and she also took away all the golden and silver ornaments from the house of the respondents. It is also submitted that the respondent no. 1 several times visited the parental house of the petitioner no. 1 to bring back her but the she straightly refused to live with the respondent. It is also submitted that the respondent no. 1 is still ready and willing to keep the petitioners in her matrimonial home.

Reply parawise:-

1-          That para no. 1 of the petition is correct and admitted.

2-          That the para no. 2 of the petition is also correct and admitted.

3-          That the para no. 3 of the petitioner is wrong and denied and not admitted. It is denied that the father of the petitioner no. 1 and have spent huge amount in the said marriage. However it is submitted that the marriage of the petitioner no. 1 with the respondent no. 1 was quite a very simple marriage because both the families of respondents and petitioner belongs to a poor class family.

4-         That the para no. 4 of the petitioner is vehemently wrong and denied as alleged by the petitioner. It is wrong and denied that the respondents did not satisfied with the dowry given by the parents to the respondents and just after the marriage the respondent no. 1 to 5 in collusion with each other started harassing the petitioner no. 1 for bringing less dowry. It is also wrong and denied that they started taunting that the parents of the petitioner no. 1 have not given sufficient dowry, and the respondents started giving beatings to the petitioner no. 1 occasionally from time to time. It is also wrong and denied that the respondents used to raise the demand of additional dowry from her in the shape of Swift Dezire car and the respondents said that they will properly keep the petitioner no. 1 if their said demand will fulfilled by the parents of the petitioner no. 1. The rest contents of this para are also wrong and denied. It is submitted that the answering respondents never beaten up the petitioner for less dowry and they never demand any dowry from the petitioner no. 1. Moreover the answering defendant no. 2 to 5 were living separately from the petitioner no. 1 and they have no concern with the present petition. The all allegations regarding dowry demand are false, fabricated and concocted one. The petitioner no. 1 has made false allegations against the answering respondents to implicate them in false case.

5-         That the para no. 5 of the petition is also wrong and denied. It is denied that the respondent no. 4 tried to rape with the petitioner no. 1. The rest contents of this para are also wrong and denied. It is submitted that the respondents belongs to a very respectable family and to defame the respondents, the petitioner no. 1 imposed such false allegation of rape against the respondents.

6-        That the para no. 6 of the petition is wrong and denied. It is denied that the respondent no. 1 has illegal affair with the respondent no. 5 and when the petitioner no. 1 requested the respondent no. 1 to not to do such things then he will not adhere on the request of the petitioner no. 1 and they gave merciless beatings to the petitioner no. 1 and they have snatched all the golden and silver ornaments of the petitioner no. 1. It is submitted that the petitioner no. 1 did not want to join the conjugal company of the respondent no. 1 and herself left the company of the respondent no. 1 and now in order to implicate the respondents she made such false allegations against the respondent no. 1 and his family members.

7-          That the para no. 7 of the petition is also wrong and denied. It is denied that at about Two and half year ago, the respondents in collusion with each other due to non fulfillment of dowry demands gave merciless beatings to the petitioner no. 1 and they pushed out the petitioner no.1 from their house and gave threatened to the petitioner no. 1 that if you will come in house again then we will kill you. It is also denied that the parents of the petitioner no. 1 came to the house of respondents and they tried to patch up the matter with the respondents but the respondent did not listen and they misbehaved with the parents of the petitioner no. 1 and they pushed out them from their house. It is also denied that at that time the petitioner no.1 was pregnant. It is submitted that all the allegations leveled against the answering respondents are false, fabricated and imaginary one. The petitioner no. 1 left the house of the respondent No.1 herself without any reasonable cause and rhyme and without any prior permission and consent of the respondent No.1 in the absence of the respondent No.1. It is further submitted that the petitioner no. 1 while leaving the house of respondent no. 1 also took away the entire gold and silver ornaments with her. And when on next day, the respondent no. 1 went to the house of the petitioner no. 1 and requested her to join the company of the respondent No.1 but the petitioner no. 1 clearly refused to join her matrimonial house. The parents of the petitioner no. 1 also insulted the respondent No.1 and they told that they would not send back the petitioner no. 1 with the respondent No.1.

8-    That the para no. 8 of the petition is wrong and denied as alleged by the petitioner no. 1. It is submitted that since the time of the marriage of the petitioner no. 1, the petitioner no. 1 many a times left the house of the respondents and she was usually in the habit of leaving the her matrimonial house. 

9-          That the para no. 9 of the petition is also wrong and denied and not admitted. The petitioner no. 1 has no valid cause of action to file the present petition. It is submitted the parents of the petitioner no. 1 never conveyed any panchayat at the house of respondents. It is pertinent to mention here that the petitioner no. 1 herself do not want to reside with the respondent no. 1 despite of several panchayat conveyed by the respondents.

10-       That the para no. 10 of the petition is also wrong and denied. However if any complaint is moved by the petitioner no. 1 against the respondents then the same is false and fabricated.

11-       That the para no. 11 of the petition is also wrong and denied. It is submitted that the petitioner no. 1 is not entitled to any such kind of relief as she left the house of respondent no. 1 herself on her own will and wish. The respondent no. 1 is ready to keep and maintain the petitioner at his house.

12-       That the para no. 12 of the petition is also wrong and denied. It is denied the respondent no. 1 works in a transport company and he has agrl. Land and from these sources the respondent no. 1 is earning more than Rs. 45,000/- per month. The rest contents of this para are also wrong and denied. It is submitted that the respondent no. 1 is a daily wage worker and the respondent no. 1 is ready to keep the petitioners at his house but the petitioner no. 1 herself is not ready to live with the respondent no. 1, so the petitioner no. 1 is not entitled to get any maintenance from the respondent no. 1.

13-       That the para no. 13 of the petition is a legal para. Hence needs no reply.

14-       That the para no. 14 of the petition is legal one.

Reply to prayer :-

                      The prayer clause of the application is wrong and denied. It is submitted that applicants/petitioners are not entitled to get any relief sought for U/s 18, 19, 20, 21 & 22 of the act as the petition is based upon the false, fabricated points and there is no weight in the petition of the petitioners hence the same is liable to be dismissed with cost, in the larger interest of justice.

                                                                             Replying Respondents

Through Counsel         

 

        In the Hon’ble court of Illaqua Magistrate 

                   Smt. _______ etc.               Vs.         Sh. ______ etc. 

Petition under section 12,18,19,20,21 & 22  of D.V Act.

Reply to the application U/s 23 of Domestic Violence Act for interim relief on behalf of the respondents.

R/Madam,

                The answering respondents submits as under :-

1-    That the para no. 1 of the application is formal. However the respondents have filed the written statement of the petition and the reply of the same may kindly be read as part and parcel of this reply.

2-    That the para no. 2 of the application is correct and admitted.

3-    That the para no. 3 of the application is wrong and denied. It is wrong to allege that the respondents have turned out the petitioner no. 1 along with her minor girl child from the matrimonial home in wearing clothes only after giving merciless beatings to the petitioner  no. 1 for not fulfilling their illegal dowry demands and has treated the petitioner no. 1 with cruelty. It is also denied that the petitioner no. 1 is unable to maintain herself and her minor child and she is  residing at her parental house on their mercy and the father of the petitioner no.1 is a poor person and is also unable to maintain the petitioners, whereas the respondent no. 1 works in a transport company and he has agrl. land also and from these sources he is earning more than Rs. 45,000/- per month and despite of this he intentionally and willfully fails to maintain the petitioners despite having good income as such the respondent no. 1 is legally duty bound to maintain the petitioners.  It is submitted that the answering respondents never beaten up the petitioner no. 1 for less dowry and the answering respondents never beaten and never demand dowry from the petitioner no. 1. The petitioner has made false allegations against the answering respondents to implicate them in false case. It is submitted that the respondent no. 1 is a daily wage worker and the respondent no. 1 is ready to keep the petitioners at his house but the petitioner no. 1 herself is not ready to live with the respondent no. 1, so the petitioner no. 1 is not entitled to get any maintenance from the respondent no. 1.

4-    That the para no. 4 of the application is wrong and denied. The petitioners are not entitled to get any maintenance amount from the respondent no. 1 as per the submissions made in reply of the petition.

               It is therefore prayed that the petitioner/applicants are not entitled for any kind of maintenance, hence the same is liable to be dismissed with costs, in the interest of justice.

Dated: .                                                                                           Respondents                                                                

Through Counsel                  



 ALSO READ THIS :

FORMAT OF BAIL BOND U/S 437 A CR.P.C.  OR PERSONAL BAIL BOND

FORMAT OF LEGAL NOTICE TO A TELECOM COMPANY ON ACCOUNT OF DEACTIVATING THE MOBILE SERVICES 

DEED OF DIVORCE

APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 25 AND 27 OF THE CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT 1986 FOR EXECUTION OF THE ORDER DATED 10-06-2010  PASSED BY THE HON’BLE FORUM

FORMAT OF COMPLAINT UNDER SECTION 12 OF THE CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT, 1986

WHAT IS SECTION 307 OF IPC 

FORMAT OF ELECTION PETITION FOR GRAM PANCHAYAT

REPLY OF ELECTION PETITION FOR GRAM PANCHAYAT | WRITTEN STATEMENT IN ELECTION PETITION

 WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN 147 148 149 IPC

MOST IMPORTANT SECTIONS OF CRPC?

WHAT ARE THE IMPORTANT SECTIONS OF CPC ?

WHAT IS VAKALATNAMA | VAKALATNAMA FORMAT DOWNLOAD IN PDF 

HOW TO COMPUTE COURT FEE TO BE PAID ON PLAINT ?

WHAT IS AN INTERIM BAIL ?

WHAT IS ANTICIPATORY BAIL ?

WHAT ARE THE DIFFERENT TYPES OF BAILS ?

WHAT IS LIMITATION OF TIME TO SEND LEGAL NOTICE US 138 OF NI ACT ?

JURISDICTION OF COURT UNDER 138 NI ACT CASE 

WHAT ARE THE DIFFERENT STAGES IN A CRIMINAL CASE ?

WHAT IS A CIVIL SUIT AND ITS DIFFERENT STAGES IN A COURT ?

WHAT ARE THE DIFFERENT TYPES OF COURTS IN INDIA ?

WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN AN ADVOCATE LAWYER AND COUNSEL ? 

WHAT IS ORDER 7 RULE 11 OF CPC ?

WHAT IS 332 OF IPC ?

WHAT IS 331 OF IPC ?

WHAT IS 330 OF IPC ?

WHAT IS 329 OF IPC ?

WHAT IS 328  OF IPC ?

WHAT IS 327  OF IPC ?

WHAT IS 324 OF IPC ?

WHAT IS SECTION 323 OF IPC

WHAT IS 325 OF IPC ?

DIFFERENCE BETWEEN 325 & 326 IPC | 325 IPC VS 326 IPC 

DRAFT OF AFFIDAVIT FOR MILITARY DECEASED PENSION | AFFIDAVIT FOR GETTING PENSION OF DECEASED ARMY MAN

MOST IMPORTANT SECTIONS AND ORDERS & RULES OF THE CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE- CPC ORDERS AND RULES 

 

DECLARATION OF LIEN UNDER SECTION 4(I) OF HARYANA CREDIT OPERATIONS & MISC.  PROVISIONS (BANKS) ACT 1973  

FORMAT OF SUIT AGAINST BANK LOAN DEFAULTER | CIVIL SUIT AGAINST BORROWER | KCC LOAN CIVIL SUIT 

APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 156(3) CR.P.C. FOR LODGING CASE/FIR UNDER SECTION 379/408/420/120-B I.P.C. | HOW TO REGISTER FIR U/S 156(3) OF CRPC.

APPLICATION FOR VALUATION OF PROPERTY 

NATIONAL LOK ADALAT BILL PERFORMA FORMAT | BILL FORMAT FOR COUNSEL FEE 

WRITTEN STATEMENT IN SUIT FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND DECLARATION 

APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 24 OF THE HINDU MARRIAGE ACT, FOR GRANT OF AD-INTERIM MAINTENANCE PENDENTELITE ALLOWANCES TO THE APPLICANT-RESPONDENT. 

MODEL MEMORANDUM OF ASSOCIATION OF THE SOCIETY  

WRITTEN STATEMENT ON BEHALF OF DEFENDANT IN DECLARATION SUIT 

REPOSSESSION AGENCY AGREEMENT

SUIT FOR DECLARATION FOR CANCELLATION OF AGREEMENT TO SALE 

AFFIDAVIT OF MILITARY DECEASED PENSION | AFFIDAVIT PENSION ARMY 

HOW TO WRITE AGREEMENT FOR SALE OF HOUSE/FLAT | AGREEMENT TO SALE 

SPECIAL POWER OF ATTORNEY FOR A HOUSE/FLAT | HOW TO WRITE AN SPA 

PETITION  UNDER SECTION  25 OF THE GUARDIAN AND WARDS ACT 1890 FOR THE CUSTODY OF MINORS 

LEGAL NOTICE FORMAT TO A HOSPITAL FOR MEDICAL NEGLIGENCE 

WHAT IS COMPLAINT UNDER SECTION 97 CRPC | FORMAT OF COMPLAINT U/S 97 CR.PC | SEARCH WARRANT 

WHAT IS AN AFFIDAVIT IN LIEU OF EVIDENCE IN A DIVORCE CASE?

DRAFT OF CONTEMPT PETITION | APPLICATION FOR COURT OF CONTEMPT UNDER ORDER 39 RULE 2-A C.P.C

SUMMARY SUIT U/O 37 OF CPC | PROVISION FOR SUMMARY SUIT | SUIT FOR RECOVERY UNDER ORDER 37 OF CPC. 

FORMAT OF SEARCH REPORT OF BANKS | WHAT IS TITLE SEARH REPORT | LEGAL SCRUTINY REPORT FOR BANK LOAN 

WHAT ARE THE REMEDIES AVAILABLE TO A PERSON TO WHOM BAIL IS REFUSED BY THE COURT?

ALL SECTIONS OF IPC | INDIAN PENAL CODE 

WRITTEN STATEMENT IN DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ACT SUIT | REPLY OF DV ACT | WS 125 CRPC

SUIT FOR RECOVERY OF MONEY | BANK RECOVERY SUIT

FORMAT OF RESTORATION APPLICATION AFTER EX PARTE PROCEEDING REGARDING 125 CRPC | EXPARTE APPLICATION

LEGAL NOTICE  TO REPLACE THE MOBILE PHONE WITH A NEW ONE OR REFUND THE BILL AMOUNT   

TALAQNAMA FORMAT | DIVORCE DEED FORMAT | TALAQNAMA | TALAQ

LEGAL NOTICE FOR CANCELLATION OF AGREEMENT TO SALE | NOTICE FOR CANCELLATION OF AGREEMENT TO SALE FORMAT  

PETITION UNDER SECTION 166 OF MOTOR VEHICLE ACT FOR GRANT OF COMPENSATION OF RS. 10,00,000/- | CLAIM PETITION INJURY

MODAL DRAFT OF CRIMINAL COMPLAINT FILED UNDER SECTION 323, 325, 506, 34 OF IPC | CRIMINAL COMPLAINT FORMAT 

 STAY AGAINST FINANCE VEHICLE | SUIT FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION AGAINST A FINANCE COMPANY

CLAIM PETITION US 166 OF THE MOTOR VEHICLE ACT | CLAIM PETITION UNDER MOTOR VEHICLE ACT, 1988

SUIT FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION AGAINST CO-PARCENARY PROPERTY | STAY AGAINST ALIENATION OF PROPERTY BY KARTA OF FAMILY.

SUIT FOR DECLARATION FOR DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE | DIVORCE BY MUSLIM MAN TO MUSLIM WOMAN 

SUIT BY A MUSLIM WOMAN FOR DECREE OF DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE UNDER DISSOLUTION OF MUSLIM MARRIAGE ACT, 1939

BLANK FORMAT OF MORTGAGE DEED FOR BANK OF BARODA

MORTGAGE DEED FOR BANK OF BARODA

AFFIDAVIT FOR CASTE CERTIFICATE, CHARACTER CERTIFICATE, CORRECTION IN NAME, RATION CARD, SCHOLARSHIP ETC.

SUIT FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION AGAINST STRANGER PERSON 

PETITION UNDER SECTION 13(1)A OF HINDU MARRIAGE ACT | DIVORCE UNDER HINDU MARRIAGE ACT

PETITION UNDER SECTION 31 OF GUARDIANS & WARDS ACT 1890 FOR GRANT OF PERMISSION TO SELL THE PROPERTY OF MINOR 

PETITION UNDER SECTION 13 B OF HINDU MARRIAGE ACT

PETITION UNDER SECTION 8 OF GUARDIAN AND WARDS ACT FOR PERMISSION FOR PERMISSION TO SALE THE PROPERTY OF MINORS

WHAT IS KHEWAT KHATONI KHASRA NUMBER | REVENUE TERMINOLOGY OF LAND

EXPERIENCE CERTIFICATE FROM BAR ASSOCIATION FOR ADVOCATE

RESUME FOR EMPANELMENT OF ADVOCATE IN BANK

LEGAL NOTICE FOR RECOVERY OF MONEY FOR GOODS SUPPLIED | LEGAL NOTICE FOR NON PAYMENT OF DUES | LEGAL NOTICE FOR NON PAYMENT OF BILL.

LEGAL NOTICE TO INSURANCE COMPANY FOR CLAIM OF STOLEN VEHICLE | CLAIM STOLEN VEHICLE | NOTICE TO INSURANCE COMPANY 

COMPLAINT UNDER SECTION 12 OF THE CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT 1986 

FORMAT OF SUPERDARINAMA | SUPARDAGINAMA 

MODAL DRAFT OF SIMPLE BAIL APPLICATION

EXPERIENCE CERTIFICATE FROM BAR ASSOCIATION FOR ADVOCATE

RESUME FOR EMPANELMENT OF ADVOCATE IN BANK 

LEGAL NOTICE FORMAT U/S 138 OF N.I ACT

125 CRPC PETITION FORMAT | 125 सीआरपीसी याचिका हिन्दी मे

 

 

               

Post a Comment

1 Comments

  1. Extremely useful information which you have shared here about law firm for us .This is a great way to enhance knowledge for us, and also beneficial for us. Thank you for sharing an article like this.

    ReplyDelete